Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., &
Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry
(CoI) framework: An exploratory study. Internet & Higher Education, 13(1/2), 37-44.
doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
The authors look at possible relationships between the community of inquiry
framework and the subject matter being taught. It is their opinion that
past researchers have acted as though the subject being taught has no effect on
the success or failure of the teaching method. Their study includes a
34 item survey given to 1173 students from two US institutions.
Their results show that the CoI framework may be more aptly applied to applied
disciplines that pure disciplines. This means the areas of education,
health care and business may use the CoI framework better than other subjects.
Archibald, D. (2010).
Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the
community of inquiry survey instrument. Internet & Higher Education, 13(1/2), 73-74.
doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001
This study looked at the relationship between using teaching and social
presence in order to predict cognitive presence. It also examined the CoI
framework in order to test its validity when explaining the interaction in
online learning.
Beyer, M., Heberlein, D., &
Sandmire, T. (2004) WSU provides all on-campus services to online learners.
Distance Education Report, 8(15) 8-8 accessed from: http://www.magnapubs.com/newsletter/story/665/
A description of services offered by Washington State
University. Included are many examples of how the entire university can
become a community of support for online students.
Cookson, Jr., P. (n.d.). Virtual
learning. Retrieved
from
A short, down-to-earth description of how assisted learning can affect
the learner.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet & Higher Education, 13(1/2), pg:31. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ872912&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ872912
The relationships between the three presences are explored and tested.
The development of a survey instrument is used to test the cognitive and
teaching presence and their influences on the cognitive presence. The
importance of the teaching presence in facilitating the community is included
in the results.
Journey to Excellence. (2008). Lts: Online learning communities. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE0csKAegvE&NR=1
Journey to Excellence. (2008). Lts: Online learning communities. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE0csKAegvE&NR=1
Stephen Heppell gives a short history of learning and describes how we now help
people help each other learn. He tells how technology has changed the
field of learning. This is part of a series from Scotland. The rest
of the series is at: http://www.journeytoexcellence.org.uk
Kuhlmann, T. (2009). Are your
e-learning courses pushed or pulled?. Rapid E-Learning Blog. Retrieved from http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/
This brief article gives the basics of how online learning has evolved from
lessons that push information to the student to lessons that allow students to
pull what they want in an upbeat, easy to understand writing.
LibraryThing. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.librarything.com/profile/ljvillwock
Laurie Villwock’s LibraryThing account featuring books about the Community of
Inquiry.
Puzziferro, M. (Producer). (2009). Challenging
our assumptions about online learning: a vision for the next generation of
online higher education. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/mpuzziferro/myths-and-assumptions-of-online-learning-slide-share
This is a longer slideshow that questions how student-centered our online
learning environments are, the accuracy of theories, and issues about quality.
No comments:
Post a Comment